Actually 9 reasons, and one of the 9 is allowed to go free and just given a gentle recommendation to verify it :P But a fun article for anyone on the fence about whether to donate or not, obviously slanted towards “yes, donate.”

  • Dadifer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    23 days ago

    No one is working on it because we have so much volume. But it is very technologically feasible.

    • athairmor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 days ago

      Feasible, yes, but we don’t currently have the technology so donors are necessary.

      There are people working on synthetic and cultured replacements. It’s not true that “we have so much volume” that no one is working on it. There’s massive shortage of donors.

    • rglullis@communick.newsM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      23 days ago

      No one is working on it because we have so much volume.

      Flip the thing around. Why should we introduce some dependency on a technology when the “simple” system is already very effective?